![]() However, fans of both titles are constantly arguing over which is the better version. My thoughts are with BBs being main focus of many players in WOWs and popular subject to debate over whether that is ok or not then one version of WOWs might let BBs be the powerhouses that so many want while the other version of WOWs could give power to Cruisers or something.Developers released World of Tanks over a decade ago, while the War Thunder is five years old. So Blitz was Wargaming's chance to avoid a repeat of the fiasco whilevstill having PC open to those who want Arty style fights. Like WOT PC once they opened the Pandora's Box of Arty they could not really remove it from WOT PC because it was a part of the game and players were divided on it so some loved it and some hated it. So definately willing to keep an open mind about WOWs Blitz because this can be like a do over for Wargaming where they can fix what some may consider glare no flaws in WOWs PC. Not to mention Blitz does not have the hated Arty to contend with which is why many players quit PC and moved to Blitz. The balance in that game is quite different than this one.ĭifferent balance is not always a bad thing, in WOT Blitz take the Maus which is a tier X I love greatly due to size and armor, it suits me well, lol have had many the epic urban brawls in Maus.īut when it came to balancing it a while back the PC version of Maus kept it's 3,000 HP and lost decent amount of armor thickness where as the Blitz version retained it's armor thickness and perhaps had it buffed, but lost 500 HP points which I considered very fair deal compared to WOT PC since if your armor is stronger you can withstand attack better than just having 500 extra HP.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |